richmond power light electric utility logo
*
Homepage Link
Company LinkCommunity Link Environment Link Entertainment Link Resources Link
Residential Customers Link
Commercial Customers Link
Industrial Customer Link
Parallax Customers Link Click to go to Parallax Site

*
powered by
FreeFind



.
 

TRI & Advancements in Environmental Technology




In 1986, the U.S. Congress passed the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA). Title III of SARA is known as the Emergency Planning and Community-Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA). Section 313 of EPCRA required the EPA to establish a Toxics Release Inventory. The Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 (PPA) further required the EPA to collect data on source reduction and recycling activities at EPCRA targeted facilities. A wide range of industries was affected.

One provision of the Act -- the Toxics Release Inventory -- requires the reporting of these chemicals on an annual basis. Initially, the provision primarily targeted chemical and other industrial facilities, including paper, printing, lumber and plastics. In 1997, the EPA added seven more industries, including electric utilities.

Other industries reporting for the first time in 1999 included coal mining, metal mining and chemical wholesalers. Industries reporting since 1987 include food, paper, plastics, electrical equipment, furniture, textiles, chemical, printing, lumber, apparel, tobacco and petroleum.

Coal- and oil-fired generating plants, considered to "coincidentally manufacture" some TRI chemicals in the electricity production process, were added to the TRI list in 1997.

Richmond Power and Light will annually report all substances as required by EPA. It is important to note that all the substances listed are not released into the environment. In all cases any release of substances from this factor is under the allowable limits mandated by the EPA. Some are contained and professionally handled, and are necessary to the day to day operations of the generation of electricity.

Terminology is critical in understanding the report to EPA. Modern industrialization has brought about the use of substances to the forefront. The implication here is simply that these substances are present and not necessarily a detriment to the community. Substances can either be "manufactured" or "otherwise used". Manufactured substances are a direct result of electric production process. Otherwise used substances are inherent in the day to day maintenance and care of electric generation equipment and are always on site. We are always looking for ways to limit or eliminate the use of substances at our facility. For example, we have stopped using hydrazine as a boiler treatment.

Richmond Power & Light has and always will follow federal and state substance requirements. Annually we file and receive the necessary permits to use any substance located on our premises. We have well trained employees who are responsible for the containment and safe use of any substance here at Richmond Power & Light. We also aggressively investigated new cutting edge technologies, in some cases we were the first in the state and the nation to implement these very technologies (see timeline below).

Richmond Power & Light is committed to being a good steward of the environment, and a good partner with our community. As the community grows, so does its need for our services. We recognize that being environmentally sensitive is not only good for the community, but it helps us as well. We must be good stewards of the environment in order to harness its potential for many years to come.

Richmond Power & Light is actively involved in preserving and enhancing our environment here in the Richmond Community.

RP&L's Environmental Timeline...

1972 - 1973
Installed Lodge-Cottrell (now Research Cottrell) electrostatic precipitators on both the #1 unit and the just completed #2 unit (1973). The #1 unit had mechanical cyclones as the original particulate removal technology but new legislation as well as technological advances in pollution control necessitated a change in equipment. Typical removal efficiencies for both precipitators are in the 99+% range. Control upgrades in the early 1990's raised removal efficiency and reliability even higher.

1980
Installed low NOX burners on #2 unit. Technology was by Combustion Engineering. First utility in nation to utilize such burners.

1986 - 1989
RP&L was selected as a host site to install and operate as a demonstration facility for the Limestone Injection Multistage Burner (LIMB) system. The technology was part of the clean coal technology program (Department of Energy), managed by Energy and Environmental Research Company. The project was essentially an SO2 reduction project designed to remove up to 70% - 80% of SO2 in coal combustion flue gas. The project was successful in providing valuable information on calcium based SO2 reduction technologies and set the stage for further projects for RP&L.

1989
Completed construction of a 325 foot good engineering practice combined smoke stack for 2 coal fired units at Whitewater Valley Generating Station. Construction was performed in approximately one year. Total gas flow through the stack is approximately 420,000 ACFM (actual cubic foot per minute) with both units running at maximum.

1990
Applied for and received a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit covering wastewater discharges from Whitewater Valley Generating Station.

1990 - 1991
RP&L was again selected to host a round 3 clean coal technology program known as LIFAC (Limestone Injection into the Furnace and Activation of unreacted Calcium Oxide). This was another SO2 reduction technology specifically suited for existing unit retrofits. The technology was of Finnish origin, the parent company being Tampella of Finland. This program again used "in furnace injection" of a calcium based sorbent; however, this particular technology made use of an external reactor for humidification of the flue gas. Target removal rates were 80% - 85% SO2 and higher utilization ratio's because of sorbent reinjection/recirculation. The project ended in approximately 1994.

1994
Installed a Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems (CEMs), designed and built by KVB, on our 325 foot common stack. Also installed monitors furnished by Thermo-Environmental Company (TECO). The system continuously monitors and logs all applicable pollutant concentrations (NOX, SO2, CO2) as well as stack gas flow rate and particulate level (opacity). The system provides RP&L necessary feedback as to whether it is meeting its air emission limits.

1997
RP&L made significant improvements in its #2 unit low NOX burners and installed on #1 unit low NOX burners. The burners on the #1 unit are of somewhat more efficient and more effective design, however, the combination of burners on both units allowed RP&L to go from a NOX emission rate of 0.75 - 0.80 lbs NOX/MMBTU down to approximately 0.38 - 0.44 lbs NOX/MMBTU. This indeed was a significant improvement in our overall air emissions level.

1999
In October of 1999 fall outage improvements were made to unit 1 low NOX burners. A new spreader design and core air were added to enhance NOX control and combustion efficiency. RP&L worked with ABB ALSTOM POWER in the implementation of the burner modifications which have proven to be beneficial to us.



.  
Click to go to Homepage